With the current restrictions we have had to close our consulting rooms, however we are still providing our services by phone and video. In this time of heightened need, clients or enquirers can call us on 1800-639-523 or use the make an online enquiry option below. Learn More

Financial Hardship

An examination of debt and poverty amongst 1900+ users of financial counselling service

October 2019

Overview

This report describes the demographics and nature of debt for all clients who accessed our Financial Counselling and Capabilities (FCC) services in the 2017-18 financial year. There was a total of 1983 clients seen during this period.

To add depth to the findings, a qualitative survey was conducted with FCC counsellors, seven of whom responded between March and April 2019. Counsellors were asked to respond based on their clients during the previous 12 months.

Key messages

  • Cost of living and poverty: an alarming number of Australian households are living below the poverty line, struggling to pay for basic needs like housing and food.
  • Women in poverty: twice as many women accessed the FCC service compared to men. Women face additional risks for financial hardship, and it is often cooccurring with family violence and poverty. Women led-single parent households require additional supports to account for these vulnerabilities.
  • Underemployment / insufficient welfare payments: clients accessing the FCC services were commonly underemployed or receiving welfare payments.
  • Debt: clients who experience higher levels of poverty are not able to access more traditional forms of credit may turn to credit cards and short-term lenders to cover their everyday expenses.
  • Mental health: was identified by counsellors as the most common reason for clients’ delay in seeking support. Counsellors also identified a considerable prevalence of suicidal ideation among clients. All respondents identified that their clients had, at some point, expressed signs of suicidal ideation.

Sample statistics

Just over a quarter of clients were aged 46-55 years old. Clients were predominantly women (62% female vs 38% male), 67% did not have concession cards, 25% pension, 8% low income health care cards, 40% were employed or self-employed and 41% not in the workforce (including stay at home parents and clients not actively looking for work).


*Not in the labour force means clients not actively looking for work such as stay at home parents.
*Not in the labour force means clients not actively looking for work such as stay at home parents.

Mental health

Mental illness was ranked as the most common contributing factor to financial problems by the FCC counsellors. All counsellors identified that their clients had at some point, expressed signs of suicidal ideation. Of the clients who disclosed they had a disability 50% reported a psychiatric or mental health condition.


Gender and the Feminisation of Poverty

Being a woman is a key risk factor for financial hardship, twice as many women accessed our FCC services during the financial year. For women, financial insecurity often sits at the nexus of family violence, limited financial literacy, and poverty. There was a high rate of family violence referrals in our sample, with FCC counsellors noting that family violence services were the third most common referral made for clients. Financial counselling should be considered as one in a suite of crisis intervention services for women experiencing family violence and consideration should be given to the co-location of FCC services with other family violence services.

Underemployment / insufficient welfare payments

Unemployment and low income were ranked by counsellors as the second and third most common contributing factors to financial hardship respectively. Increasing cost of living, in the world’s 5th most unaffordable housing market (Dosen et al. 2018), combined with increasing numbers of people in insecure employment arrangements – including casual work and short-term contracts – have likely contributed to FCC counsellors reporting that an increasing cohort of clients are stuck in insecure or inadequate employment.

Going without food or heating and borrowing and lending to cover expenses are some of the strategies being used by individuals and families to cope (The Brotherhood of Saint Laurence 2018). This does not enable financial stability or resilience and further entrenches people into poverty and financial hardship.

Recurrent debt

The need to pay for essential living expenses combined with perceived unsuitability for more traditional forms of credit, can drive people living in poverty to sign for loans with exorbitant interest rates from unethical payday lenders.

According to Ali et al. (2015), problematic forms of credit such as payday lending has grown considerably since the Global Financial Crisis to pay for everyday expenses such as household bills, utilities and food to supplement insufficient income or benefit payments. All the FCC counsellors surveyed for this report believed that their clients would have used a payday lender at some point in the previous 12 months.

Cultural diversity and cultural debt

A fifth of the clients that accessed Better Place FCC services in the 2017-18 financial year were culturally and linguistically diverse. Research shows a link between being from a non-English speaking country and financial vulnerability. Limited English language proficiency adds to the challenge of navigating lending and banking systems and in times of crisis can become compounded by feelings of shame and fear. Delivering services to culturally diverse communities requires consideration of these additional complexities and building the capacity of local services that are best placed to respond effectively to cultural challenges.

Poverty and lending practices

Most of the FCC counsellors agreed that banks (post new legislation) and utility providers were more agreeable to making payment plans for clients than telcos and debt collectors who were considered the least agreeable. This speaks to the need for revised legal frameworks that protect vulnerable populations from exploitation by lenders.

The role of Financial Counselling Services

To help clients navigate these challenges FCC counsellors reported that the most common referral to support services was to legal advice (71%), this makes sense for clients who likely have creditors and need legal advice and protection. In addition, mental health counselling, housing services, employment services and Centrelink, and emergency relief were equally common with 43% of responses each. Counsellors reported referrals to a wide range of support services, reflecting the diversity of people’s experiences and the complexity of financial hardship.

The complexity of financial systems and power and information asymmetries between service users and banks and lenders make financial counselling services an essential part of supporting people in financial hardship. To reflect the current social, economic and regulatory landscape the financial counselling system needs to evolve, and dedicated NGO services are uniquely positioned to assist governments in co-designing a new financial counselling system that more effectively responds to vulnerable communities.

Summary

This paper describes the demographics and nature of debt for all clients who accessed our FCC services during the year between July 2017 and June 2018. There was a total of 1983 clients seen during this period. The average number of sessions per client was 2.3, and the waiting time for their first appointment was 18 days. Most clients received the required assistance in a short period of time and their problems were resolved satisfactorily. Since the 2015 – 2016 financial year, the number of clients accessing the FCC service has more than doubled.

References

Ali, P and McRae, CH and Ian Ramsay (April 21, 2015) Payday Lending Regulation and Borrower Vulnerability in the United Kingdom and Australia. Journal of Business Law, 2015, Issue No. 3, pp. 223-255. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2597393

Dosen, I, Aroozoo M & Michael Graham (2018) The Cost of Living: An Explainer. Research & Inquiries Unit. Parliamentary Library & Information Service. Melbourne: Parliament of Victoria.

Scroll to Top